Toby Samuel vs Mees Rottgering Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 07 Oct at 03:29 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Samuel vs M. Rottgering

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Samuel 1 - 0 Rottgering
They have played 2 sets in total, with Toby Samuel winning 2 and Mees Rottgering winning 0. The last match between Toby Samuel and Mees Rottgering was at the Hersonissos 5 Challenger, 07-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Toby Samuel getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Samuel | 1 |
| Rottgering | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Hersonissos 5 Challenger(10-07-25)
T. Samuel vs M. Rottgering H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $36,000 | Career Prize Money | $3,795 |
| 71.88% (92-36) | Career Total W/L | 53.26% (49-43) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 6 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
T. Samuel vs M. Rottgering Match Preview:
- Toby Samuel has a slight advantage in second serve performance, winning 45.12% of points compared to Mees Rottgering's 42.62% over the last 6 months.
- In terms of return game, Samuel again leads by winning 48.22% of opponent's second serve points, while Rottgering manages 45.40%.
- First serve return stats also favor Samuel with a win percentage of 28.74% versus 27.36% for Rottgering.
- Could breakpoint saving skills impact the match outcome? Samuel seems better, saving 47.86% of breakpoints, outpacing Rottgering's 45.93%.
- Considering overall match outcomes, Samuel's win rate in the past year is significantly higher at 72.55% compared to Rottgering's 52.00%.
- Both players excel on Hard courts with a winning percentage of 76%, a key factor if the match surface is Hard.
- At the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level, Samuel boasts a higher success rate of 77.50%, while Rottgering sits at 56.76%.
- Direct head-to-head comparison reveals a clear lead for Samuel, having won their only encounter decisively 6-3, 6-1.
- Analyzing opponent quality, Samuel has faced slightly tougher competition, with an average opponent rank of 362.55, better than Rottgering's 396.5.
- What are the chances of both players in a deciding set? Samuel's record is better at 45% compared to Rottgering's 38%.
Editorial Prediction (October 7, 2025, UTC):
Considering the statistical analysis, Toby Samuel demonstrates superior performance in both service and return games, especially on Hard courts. His ability to win key points under pressure, alongside a stronger recent match record, gives him an upper hand.
The past head-to-head victory also provides Samuel a psychological advantage, demonstrating his capability to outplay Mees Rottgering efficiently.
Given all data points and assuming no unforeseen circumstances, Toby Samuel appears more likely to triumph in this upcoming competition.
Toby Samuel vs Mees Rottgering Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Samuel vs M. Rottgering H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:22:38 | Average Match Time | 1:22:38 |
| 63% (31/49) | 1st Serve % | 45% (26/58) |
| 68% (21/31) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (17/26) |
| 44% (8/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 22% (7/32) |
| 55% (6/11) | Break Pts Won % | 40% (2/5) |
| 59% (34/58) | Return Points Win % | 41% (20/49) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Samuel Recent Matches Played
M. Rottgering Recent Matches Played

T. Samuel vs M. Rottgering Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71.88% (92/36) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.26% (49/43) |
| 70.28% (201/85) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.96% (109/93) |
| 58.02% (1574/1139) | Games Win/Loss | 51.13% (975/932) |
| 77.03% (57/17) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.66% (22/19) |
| 75.00% (3/1) | Clay Win/Loss | 52.78% (19/17) |
| 60.00% (18/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53.85% (7/6) |
| 70.00% (14/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0.39 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 513 | Aces Total | 196 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 248 | Total Double Faults | 293 |
| 1:31:39 | Average Match Time | 1:38:28 |
| 422.13 | Average Opponent Rank | 409.33 |
| 66% (5402/8234) | 1st Serve % | 59% (3441/5849) |
| 71% (3821/5402) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (2299/3441) |
| 51% (1452/2832) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1184/2408) |
| 47% (405/861) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (268/584) |
| 42% (3463/8207) | Return Points Win % | 41% (2445/5900) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 45.83% (11/13) | Challenger W/L | 33.33% (4/8) |
| 78.43% (80/22) | Futures W/L | 57.14% (44/33) |
| 74% (92/125) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (47/88) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (19/34) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 63% (17/27) |
| 48% (14/29) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (9/22) |
| 91% (96/87) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (49/43) |
| 9% (96/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (49/6) |
| 16% (32/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (43/6) |